âYamcha was⊠um, not always faithful. She got fed up and broke up with him for good. Then she saw my father, sitting all alone, and it just⊠happened.â -Future Trunks, Viz Manga TranslationÂ
âUnfaithful.â âFickle.â I really like this line and its dub variations because it still makes me pause and think about Yamcha and Bulmaâs relationship, which is pretty overlooked by fans, despite having lasted 15 years. Like. 15 YEARS. Itâs kinda fascinating so I thought Iâd bring it up. Unless someone on here reads Japanese and can pick apart Trunksâ word usage, we basically just have the dub versions to go by. English-speaking discussions tend to fall within two camps, âI canât see Yamcha cheating on Bulma, itâs against his character, Bulma put a spin on thingsâ or âBulma was an innocent, sassy flower and cuck-Yamcha was cheating SCUMâ. Now, for fans who are firmly in either camp, you can call me a fascist buttmuncher if you want, but Iâm willing to wager that the truth fell somewhere in the middleâŠ
⊠I think, over 15 years, thereâs a lot of ground to cover, and they started when they were still teens. Itâs not like either of them started out as model relationship material. And itâs not like Bulma wasnât openly trying to seduce General Blue, or Zarbon, or outright declaring her wish to replace Yamcha with a better guy. You know, one that calls her when heâs off training for a year (in DB and DBZ.)Â
Letâs blow aside the idea of âfaithfulâ only meaning ânot cheatingâ for a second here before we go further. Whether or not they ever âcheatedâ on each other when they werenât having one of their âbreaksâ during their on-and-off relationship, you could easily see that in many ways, the two of them werenât âcommittedâ to each other (if your favored word here is âfickleâ instead of âunfaithfulâ) despite staying âstuckâ together and in their lives. When you consider the concept of faithfulness meaning that someone is the âonly oneâ for you, which I think we can all agree is what Bulma really wantedâand also what Yamcha really wanted, we can see that for two people who desperately wished to be with someone, neither of them really filled that role for each other.Â
 ⊠I think primarily, what being âfickleâ or âunfaithfulâ really meant to Bulma, was that Yamcha was not always settled on, or committed to her. Or at least, he didnât treat her like it to the extent she needed. I donât think he necessarily cheated. But, I think with his baseball career, being famous in that right, and having fangirls, AND finally being confident around girls⊠youâd think that over the years, Yamcha sowed his oats a little, threw his weight around some⊠particularly during their separations. Now, him doing that during a break isnât necessarily wrong, but to Bulma, who felt threatened by that kind of attention and those exploits, it must have signaled: Iâm fine not having you, youâre replaceable. Iâm not SERIOUS about you. I can walk away anytime. And if I were her, Iâd think that if he were really committed to her, heâd have spent those breaks trying to get her back instead of playing the field.Â
Or even so, letâs also imagine Yamcha never even slept with anyone else during any of their breaks (which I doubt, but hey, letâs Devils Advocate here) but was a good guy, despite being a little dumb, easy to flatter, fluster and charm and got himself roped into some bad-looking situations that he still didnât necessarily stop. And Bulma seeing Yamchaâs hapless galavanting with fangirls, his long periods of blowing her off, and any involvement he really had with women during the âoffâ periods of their relationship would come across as being very suspicious, and would call his overall commitment to her in the long run into question.Â
And when youâre teens, and fucking off in your early 20s, thatâs one thing. But if you guys are in your 30s, and itâs been 15 years, and that kinda shit is still going on, then my God, what are you doing? What is your life? And Yamcha isnât spending any of the âbreaksâ they have in the latter part of their relationship staying single and waiting out for HER, then like. Why the Hell would she stay? I think Bulma finally dumping Yamcha for good was an act of self-respect for her that took many years in the making, from a girl who would search all over the world for a wished-upon boyfriend (because, what, she couldnât just find one on her own, miss rich-gorgeous-brilliant-buxom babe?) and who settled in an on-and-off relationship with him, to a grown woman who finally had enough and would rather be alone than be stuck in that bullshit for another 15 years.Â
âThen she saw my father, sitting all alone, and it just⊠happened.â And like, look at this regal rebound-sex troll who boomeranged back and didnât leave. Look at Vegeta and the relationship security he wound up offering in comparison. NO fangirls (in canon, cough) he keeps to himself, and unless special circumstances arise, is a total gravity room homebody. Who he gonna call if he and Bulma take a break? (Goku) NO one, thatâs who, and Bulma likes that đ
Well its an interesting perspective but⊠Well.. Bulma was still quite immature at the time tbh, so I have a wee bit of doubt this was about growing up and ânot settlingâ for an on again/off again thing. Honestly, I think they broke up as usual over something stupid, she got horny, Vegeta was there and also horny, and⊠Suddenly sheâs knocked up and heâs gone and now both are seemingly over.
I mean I know people really want VegeBul stuff to be super serious, adult, and romanticized but thereâs really nothing to back that for a long time. Vegeta got her pregnant, still didnât care about her or their child, and she even kicked him out of her home. He only came back in an attempt to emulate his rival, thinking that may have been what made him strong. Even then he stayed detached, refusing to so much as hug his own child. Took him 7 years to get to the point of being willing to even do that. Sure it happened eventually, but it happened years after the fact.
Again I get wanting to rationalize what happened, and its pretty open to interpretation, but the idea Vegeta offered her some sort of âadultâ relationship doesnât hold up, imo. Just my two cents.
July 12 is National Different Coloured Eyes Day. The difference in colouration of the iris is called heterochromia iridum or heterochromia iridis. In complete heterochromia, one iris is a different colour from the other. In sectoral heterochromia, part of one iris is a different colour from its remainder. In central heterochromia, there is a ring around the pupil or possibly spikes of different colours radiating from the pupil.Â
Since I am obsessed with eye colours in general, heterochromia in specific, and losing my mind whenever I spot it in a wolfâs iris, Iâm going to post some heterochromia wolves. Enjoy!
P.S.: do you know of any other pictures of wolves with heterochromia? Or do you have a dog with two different coloured eyes? Share it with us in the reply to this post! It would make my day seeing that âĄ
Fisherman Robinson Russell has been fishing for over 20 years, but he
wasnât quite prepared for what he saw in one lobster haul off Grand
Manan Island in Canada. Mixed in with the other lobsters was one
stunning crustacean with a translucent blue-pink shell. Dubbed a âcotton
candyâ lobster, Russell donated his findâwhich he named Luckyâto the Huntsman Marine Science Center in New Brunswick, Canada.
listen up, goyim, because iâm gonna say this once and once only.
antisemitism is a form of oppression, but it relies on a different mindset. it is a different ballgame than ANY sort of prejudice you know. yknow why? because to antisemities, jews arenât lesser (well, we are, but thatâs not the important thing). weâre successful.
thatâs the kicker.
antisemities WANT you to believe that jews are doing well, because if weâre doing well, weâre not REALLY being persecuted. it all goes back to the protocols of the elders of zion: the jews are taking over. the jews are a threat. therefore, if theyâre a threat, itâs only right to kill them. itâs only right to ghettoize them. itâs only right to have exterminated 40% of the worldâs jewish population in the 40s.
nevermind the fact that antisemitism makes up nearly 50% of all religious hate crimes in the us. nevermind the fact that jews make up less than 2% of the worldâs population. nevermind the fact that jews, historically, have been scapegoated and killed and othered for literal millenia. i mean, who cares, because jews are rich and powerful, right?
donât fall for it. donât fall for the centuries-old claim that jews are just faking it. listen to us. support us.
and the next time you brush off antisemitism because âoh, itâs not a big deal, jews are successfulâ, take a good hard look at yourself and realize that youâre spouting the same nazi propaganda that killed six million people.
Also because we arenât successfulâŠtime for some fun data:
Some episode ideas that never made it into Gravity Falls (text below in case pictures donât load (italicized comments are mine)):
Dipper and Mabel are pretty good and actually kind of respect them now. (guessing this was the last part of one from a previous page)
The BIG THING is in townâŠredneck owner taunts Stan. Mocks him in front of other tourists. Stan feels washed up? Or tells the kids to go spy on the BIG THING?
Episode with They Might Be Giants voicing ACTUAL GIANTS. Huge footprints in forest get Dipper curious. And he and Wendy go out to find out the source? Whats the story here? They can cause earthquakes?
Superpowers- Episode where something gives Mabel super strength. Dipper gets the ability to make his enemies grow hair. Or something random and stupid. Soos gets the power of lightning. Wendy can control animals? But only snails or something? (I think Alex might have mentioned this in one of the commentaries, I might have enjoyed this)
Pacifica needs the kids help- against her better judgement. Something went missing from daddyâs mansion. Hates them but is going to get in trouble, lose her credit card privileges, etc. Dipper helps her but hates her. She meanwhile tries to seduce Dipper to learn something, and he tells her off LOUD and VISCERAL. You are whatâs wrong with this world. Sheâs hurt, but also impressed. And Kinda likes him now. No one talks to her that way. We learn that sheâs more human than we thought. It turns out sheâs under a LOT of pressure from her parents? Still is terrible though. (looks like elements from this one made it into âNorthwest Mansion Mysteryâ)
RumorCrunchers (Mythbusters) come to town and Stan doesnât want his Shack getting debunked on state-wide television.
Story where horrible new mayor causes intense censorship. Where we can stick it to censors for being the bain of existence. (HA!)
Durland has book and canât read
Mabel gets good at miming )
âChristmasâ Special- Starts with Stan blanketing town in snow trying to free mammoth. Maybe THIS is where we do our THE THING parody? Or maybe something more horrifying? Must defy everything we hold dear about the holidays. (glad we at least got THE THING parody in âInto the Bunkerâ)
âThe Flyâ- Dippers fly is always down. Turns out this is caused by the ghost of a kid he used to always mock in elementary school. Heâs getting what he deserved for tormenting the guy. In order for him to let the curse go Dipper has to get the ghost what the ghost wants- a date with his sister or whatever. (Dipper does not end up caring what people think about his fly, and not caring makes him impossible to mock? Etc?)
Stan builds a Computer- Explores Dippers obsession with the internet, which he misses, and Stanâs phobia of technology. Computer leads to fascinating horror. But what? Kids really need to check their internet things.
Scary-Oke- Story which begins with kids needing to sing karaoke song together, somehow involves them using karaoke to (page covered) whatever in the end (okay, so THIS one got made)
Harryhausen Episode- Season Twoâs âFight (page covered) Stan fighting off 30 claymation skeletons (page covered) giant crab? Robot Owl? Something (page covered) (seeing bits from âLittle Gift Shop of Horrorsâ and âSoos and the Real Girlâ)
The only way weâre ever going to solve homelessness is by giving free housing to homeless people.Â
Not cots in homeless shelters. Not beds in domestic violence shelters. Real, actual, permanent housing, with a door they can lock and the freedom to come and go as they please.Â
It seems like a stupidly simple solution to an incredibly complicated problem, but this is the only way weâre ever going to end homelessness for good. Everything weâre doing right now is like flinging thimbles of water onto a house fire, and itâs time to call the fire department. Donât believe me? Consider that:
Providing free housing is actually cheaper than what weâre doing right now. Even when you factor in the cost of having round-the-clock mental health staff on hand in housing facilities, giving the homeless housing costs about one-third as much as leaving them on the streets. How is that possible? People who sleep on the streets go to the hospital a whole lot more than anyone else. Being homeless is hard on your health – you are more likely to be assaulted, experience frostbite or heatstroke, or fail to manage a medical condition like diabetes. Homeless people are also more likely to get arrested for minor things like public urination or loitering, and itâs hugely expensive to arrest them, process them, put them in prison and put them through court dates. We save so much money and eliminate so many problems by just giving them somewhere to live.Â
Itâs extremely difficult to get a job when you donât have an address. Thereâs a huge amount of prejudice against homeless people, and the same people who shout âget a job!â are the first to toss someoneâs application in the trash as soon as they see âno fixed addressâ. Having an address also makes it easier to vote, open a bank account, keep up with your taxes and obey the terms of your probation.Â
Homeless people waste a lot of time standing in line for shelters and services. Shelters have limited space available, and if you want to make sure you have a bed for the night, you need to be there long before the doors open. The same thing applies to soup kitchens. When your whole life revolves around being in line for vital services for hours on end, itâs hard to make much progress in getting your life together. Providing people with housing gives them more time and more flexibility to return to school, find jobs, or reconnect with family.Â
Itâs virtually impossible to manage a mental health condition or recover from addiction when you have no permanent housing. Itâs just not going to happen. Recovering from a mental health issue requires stability, routine and a safe place to retreat to, which are impossible when you live on the streets. Living rough makes it extremely difficult to show up to appointments, hang on to your prescription medications and avoid trauma. Itâs more efficient for everyone involved to provide housing to the mentally ill first, and bring mental health services right to their doors.Â
Itâs hard to make much progress in life when you canât accumulate possessions. Think about how hard your life would be if you had no safe place to store your things. When youâre homeless and sleeping in shelters, you can only keep as much stuff as you can carry with you, and most of your energy is going to go towards keeping that stuff safe. You canât take advantage of clothing drives, because you canât carry too many clothes. You eat a lot of fast food, because you have nowhere to store or prepare groceries. Showing up to appointments, interviews or shifts is difficult, because you have to lug everything you own with you to ensure nothing is stolen. Having a room with a lock changes everything.Â
It keeps children out of the foster system. Ending up on the streets often means losing your children – if you canât provide children with a stable home, thatâs grounds to take them away. Families fleeing domestic violence can find themselves re-traumatized when children are placed in foster care due to inadequate housing. Providing stable housing allows families to stay together and minimizes trauma for children and parents, as well as foster care costs.Â
It preserves basic human dignity. Itâs hard for most of us to imagine how humiliating and dehumanizing it is to be homeless. Imagine not having access to regular showers, or even toilets. Having nowhere to clean your laundry. Having your schedule dictated by a homeless shelter. Sleeping in rooms with dozens or hundreds of other people, with absolutely no privacy. Being chased out of businesses and public places. Enduring the crushing boredom of having nowhere to go. Being treated as less than human. Itâs impossible to maintain hope and dignity in those conditions, and no human being should have to endure that.Â
We live in a society that treats housing like something you have to âearnâ by proving yourself worthy of it, and that toxic thinking has put us in a position where weâre literally willing to spend more money to have people sleeping in the streets. It has to stop. Housing is a bare minimum requirement for human dignity, and it should be a human right. Everyone deserves a safe and private space of their own, regardless of their abilities, mental health or circumstances. No one is asking for luxury condos here – dorm-style settings with private rooms and shared bathroom and kitchen facilities have proven to be effective. This isnât about who âdeservesâ housing; if you are a human being, you deserve a safe place to call home.Â