pinkargylesweater:

tikaltyrant:

ginger—cow:

Remember in Assburgers Kyle said that hanging out with Stan was starting to make him feel depressed?

And people thought he was being selfish or uncaring but really, have you seen Kyle when he is low?

image

It really


image


doesn’t


image


tend


image


to


This was a great response – I just wanted to comment that while you make a great point about situational depression and a neurological disorder, which I agree with whole heartedly, I didn’t mean for the post to come across like I was comparing the two, it was more to say that, regardless of his age, Kyle reacts to things in a very unhealthy way and suggested that it may not have been very good for him to be there for Stan when Stan was trying to drag him down with him (in fact I would go as far as to suggest that Kyle’s impulsive behaviour and intense emotions are characteristics of other neurological disorders that are not depression – and you can definitely see how he may also have inherited this also).

I really really felt for Stan in this story arc and I would not have defended Kyle if Stan had just asked Kyle to be there for him while he went through this and Kyle turned away. But that’s not how it went. Stan was trying to bring Kyle down with him and to convince him to see he world in the same way that he did. And I don’t blame Stan for that either because when you feel that way you may see comfort in other people who feel the same because you’re not alone. But it’s still not good for the other person.
I feel that a lot of people on here who talk about people with depression act as though other people are obliged to tend to their every need and while I encourage support if you yourself are mentally sound, if you are clearly not in a healthy frame of mind and being supportive will do you more harm than good you have absolutely no obligation to be there (even more so if that person shouts abuse at you). Finally, Regardless of the cause of the depression, it’s still a serious matter and should be taken into account if it is dangerous for that person.

This post isn’t about who has it worse, it’s about how differently they react to certain situations. And how people assume that Kyle is in a healthy state of mind and should be unconditionally supportive.

YES TO THIS!!!!

I’ve been in a situation where I knew a person once who seemed to have depression. Granted, I don’t think they had an official diagnosis and they are no longer a part of my life, but because of my own experience I could understand the actions of Kyle. That person was super negative and just saw the negativity in everything. It was really draining to be around them and honestly, I felt it wasn’t good for me either mentally and emotionally, because I am definitley not healthy in that department. (I have anxiety and trauma disorders).

So, while I would have loved Kyle to have been more supportive especially since it’s his super best friend we’re talking about, I understand why he decided to try and move on. I pretty much said the same thing in this post.

Anyways, this makes me interested in what nuerological disorder Kyle may have?

So I finally got to You’re Getting Old and Ass Burgers

And oh boy talk about an emotional downer ride! I wish I could write an analysis about these eps, but I feel like I am not that obsessed or know well enough about Style to actually write one, and it always got to me how Kyle could not supoort Stan.

At the same time though, I can completley understand him because when you’re with a person who is negative all the time and just finds the negativity in everything. Well, it really is hard for one’s own emotional and mental well being. Kyle said it himself, being around Stan was like a black hole, and from personal experience, he’s not exactly wrong.

I don’t want to go into detail, but I had met someone who was negative about everything, they were also creepy in other ways, but that’s another story, and again, speaking with people like that is hard. Like I don’t want to downplay how they see and feel stuff, not at all, especially if the person is clinically suffering from depression or some other mental illness.

It’s hard to explain. Again, I can see why Kyle thought it was best to let Stan go. I don’t think it’s cause he didn’t care, or being selfish, he has to take care of himself too. He tried hanging out with Stan, idk if necessarily helping him, but there was just so much he could do. It’s also important for Stan to make an effort, though with depression and the like, it is super hard..

Ahhh, I don’t know. It’s just such a complex and difficult situation to be in.

I really wish Kyle could have tried helping Stan more, u know. Like Kyle, honey, are you seriously trading Stan for Cartman of all people.

Oh, and furthermore, it’s not like Kyle wasn’t upset about letting Stan go. He went to see him at the lake though he didn’t actually approach Stan. Maybe Kyle just threw himself into the whole hamburger business to not think about losing his super best friend and hoped Stan would eventually be okay. Again from personal experience, I think one does eventually realize that no matter how painful it is, sometimes, you really just have to let people go. Your bond with them might not be the same, but it could still be there, u know. Especially the memories of fun times. Things really do change. For better or worse, but I mean there’s always a chance for something better eventually. At least having hope for it.

And who knows, it’s not like they couldn’t one day rekindle their friendship. They’re so young and have much to learn and experience after all!

Well, it’s hard to organize my thoughts, cause these eps screwed with my emotions. I know people say, Stan and Kyle’s friendship is not the same after this, and while that scares and pains me to no end, I will wait to see for myself! Maybe, I will see things differently, I really am hoping to cause STYLE DAMMIT!! lol. And if I do, I’ll see if I write something to see how Stan and Kyle have drifted or not; just their overall dynamic now. Oh, and also just how much of an alcoholic Stan may or may not be!

Wish me luck as I dive more into South Park and especially Style!

dontatmeimseriously:

image

Something like two weeks MONTHS ago @ericbroflovski asked me how I personally interpreted Kyle’s ~Moral Character~, and I wrote so many words that I figured it was a waste not to clean them up and organize it into a formal meta post. Full credits to gina/sweeticing, whose input helped refine these thoughts, & who I definitely quote at least once down here.

*rolls up my fucking sleeves, cracks open the whiskey and eats some grapes* Okay,  who’s ready to get Extremely Pretentious and take South Park WAY too seriouslyℱ. 

1. PHILOSOPHICAL IDEALISM AND STRUCTURE

image
image

So, Kyle is often referred to as an “idealist” in the sense that he believes, ultimately, that humanity is capable of rising above the ugly aspects of its nature and is drawn back to this belief again and again despite being continuously disappointed. But I’d go further than the commonly understood definition and argue that Kyle is a Idealist character in the (boring) Philosophical (jargon) sense of the word as well, which is to say that his default view of the world is actually a lot more on the “spiritual” end of metaphysics than you might expect from a character who often gets pinned as “the logical one”.

Keep reading

*claps* This is amazing

marshwalker-stan:

* takes a long drag from cigar * Here are some Unpopular Opinions ℱ

‱Kyman is abusive, and Cartman isn’t the only abusive one. Kyle is just as abusive in their relationship as Cartman. Kyle is not nearly as shitty of a person as Cartman, but they’ve both tried killing each other (even if they have also both saved each other) They both start arguments, they both thrive off the other suffering, and they both intentionally do things to hurt/sabotage one another. Sorry to say it folks, relationships are about building each other up and bringing out the best in one another. That is a healthy relationship, yes there are bumps and yes there can be problems but if your relationship is dedicated to making each other feel shitty and whatnot it’s not healthy it’s toxic.

‱Style is a good ship, but has problematic aspects. One of them being how Kyle handles Stan’s depression. He abandoned his friend in a time of need for Cartman. In fact that entire episode was reallllyyyyy out of character, but regardless Kyle still gave up on his friend bc he was “making him feel depressed too” rather than try finding the source of the problem and trying to help like he’d normally do he left him in a time of need. There’s also the aspect of Stan occasionally being a jerk and not caring about others either.

‱Now despite popular belief, no I don’t think Stan is an alcoholic. He drank it in one episode where it became a problem, then at the end was shown taking a sip from his secret bottle. 1) a sip isn’t nearly enough to get drunk, alcoholics get addicted to becoming drunk stan wasn’t drunk he took a sip maybe enough to get a buzz at most and 2) he’s never shown drinking it again and 3) He CANONLY has developed coping mechanisms. He CANONLY suffers from trauma/repressed memories and CANONLY has found coping mechanisms. INCLUDING acknowledging his addictive personality and doing things to keep away from things that he can become addicted to. While the episode only covered Freemium games it implies other things like ALCOHOL too. So sorry guys Stan ISNT an alcoholic and doesn’t wanna end up like his dad. (Also, Stan is canonly a happy drunk not a depressed drunk)

‱Wendy leaving Stan for Token wasn’t a dick move. I love stan, I do, hes the most relatable character for me and I love him. But Wendy deserves better. He tries his best but he constantly does things that either anger her or out right disrespect her. She’s not perfect either, no, and I think if they both made adjustments they could work things out. (Also just bc I say this doesn’t mean I don’t ship Stendy or Stendyle bc both those are my shit)

‱Creek is a forced relationship and overrated. It was literally no different than an arranged marriage and yes don’t get me wrong they do support each other and it is a healthy relationship, but idk the whole forced aspect of it is just bad and if it’d just happen naturally it’d be a lot better. Regardless I still like it, but I mean the only reason they got together was to make other people happy. Again that’s not what a relationship should be about. But in recent episodes they have been shown to actually care and at the very least be very good friends so * shrugs *

‱Butters isn’t a sweet innocent angel. He’s fully capable of being an asshole and has shown it multiple times. He’s still the most naive and probably sweetest of the boys, but he’s not an innocent baby.

‱Same goes to Jimmy who I also love but jesus dude he made fun of his friend because his mom fucking died. (Deleted scene from Reverse Cowgirl) Which mind you Butters was in on.

‱Clyde Donovan deserves better and I will NOT rest until he gets the appreciation and love he needs

OKAY BUT LIKE ALL OF THIS^

That is literally why I cannot stand Kyman. Notp for me. People can ship whatever tf they want, but like have the decency to admit it is super unhealthy and toxic. Though I feel Cartman is the most abusive, Kyle is definitley no push over and can kick his ass. I mean he has done things like egging Cartman off to jump off a roof when everyone else was saying it was a bad idea. I love Kyle because of his super kind and caring heart, but like everyone on the show he can be a dick at times. Lol. He is, again, super kind and has a good heart, but Kyle is no saint. Still one of the more nicer characters, I think.

And omg yeah. As much as I love Style. Otp. It definitley is not exactly healthy. It’s why this ship has caused me so much pain!!! lol. Like I cringe and cry everytime Stan and Kyle don’t support each other. LIke c’mon guys you’re super best friends and allowed to make mistakes, but sometimes it’s just like wtf?! Be more supoortive and understanding!

Idk if in Assburgers Kyle was ooc cause still watching the series for the first time, but in a way I understood where he was coming from. When interacting with a person who is negative and depreased it really is hard and draining. That’s why it’s important to set boundaries for your own mental health and well being. But yeah, it’s pretty just ???? that Kyle ddn’t seem to take the time to help Stan like ???

Also, that’s a interesting note about Stan and alcohol! Will have to really watch out for that as I reach later seasons!

This is mainly what I wanted to say. I don’t ship Stendy, but biased cause Style! And idk if Stan and Wendy could work out, but she does deserve better. I mean despite being together, Stan hadn’t talked to her for weeks. I don’t think I see them having that much in common? Not sure tho.

I like how you mentioned Creek. Not a good way to start a relationship, but I’m pretty happy wih it because it is literally one of the HEALTHIEST relationships I havr ever seen. And as someone with an anxiety disorder, it’s super important to me that Craig really tries to help and understand Tweek. Especially with all the stigma and discrimination there is about mental illness.

My final comment will be on Butters. Just YES. This is why I ha e enjoyed seeing him slowly stand up to Cartman in later seasons. Before he kind of just took it, but I’m glad to see him stand up and talk back to Cartman. Butters is one of the nicest, if not the nicest character on the show. But you’re right. He’s no angel. I mean just look at what his intentions were with Professor Chaos. Despite his plans failing and being goofy and funny, idk man, the intent of causing chaos and panic was stil there.

Hello! Your character analysis stuff is so well written and spot on! It makes my Matt and Trey analysis stuff seem total shit XD Have you studied psychology or something? Would you be interested in doing one about Stan and Kyle’s friendship and how/ why they go from being best friends to threatening to shoot or beat each other up?

fairyetc:

theongreyjoysassfullofheroin:

fairyetc:

behind-the-blow:

squaretactics:

Hi! You’re very kind, but
no, I’ve never studied psychology or anything. I just really love South Park and I think about the characters a lot. Too
much, probably. And nonsense, I love your Matt and Trey analyses!

Stan and Kyle are my two
favorite characters so of course I’ll discuss them and their friendship. I
think these two complement each other very well and balance each other out.
Normally, they’re attached at the hip, but these Super Best Friends have had an
argument or two (or three or four). They’ve fought or betrayed or called each
other out on five different occasions, if my memory serves: “Prehistoric Ice
Man,” “Mystery of the Urinal Deuce,” “Crack Baby Athletic Association,” “You’re
Getting Old/Ass Burgers,” and “Butterballs.”

The first two episodes
are pretty useless in terms of analysis and characterization. “Prehistoric Ice
Man” is the episode where Stan and Kyle have their first real fight. However,
this is early South Park and the boys haven’t developed their distinct
personalities yet. During season 2, Stan and Kyle are pretty much the same kid,
which means the fight doesn’t add any merit to their friendship. “Mystery of
the Urinal Deuce” is also an exception because Stan betrays Kyle to protect
himself from getting in trouble for crapping in the urinal. I don’t think he
intends to target Kyle in any way, but Kyle gets caught up in the plot and
won’t stop digging, in that Kyle way of his. Stan sort of has his back against
the wall here and pulls a gun on his friend to save himself. That doesn’t make
it okay, but it’s certainly understandable, and clear Stan didn’t do so because
of any malice towards Kyle.

Now things get a little
more interesting. I’ll compare “Crack Baby Athletic Association” and
“Butterballs” because they’re very similar in the way Stan and Kyle disagree.
“CBAA” has Kyle agreeing with Cartman and acting immorally so he seeks
validation from Stan. He rants and raves in Stan’s ear about why what he’s
doing is okay when he’s really trying to convince himself. He seeks Stan’s
acceptance because Stan is the closest thing to himself he can find. If Stan
says its fine, he can quit feeling guilty. However, Stan says “You sound like
Cartman” and stares deadpan the rest of the time because that’s all he has to say. He knows Kyle enough to be
aware that comparing him to Cartman is the ultimate insult and this comment
will cause him to sort himself out.

On the flipside, Stan’s
ego gets the best of him again in
“Butterballs” and Kyle is the only one who tries to make him see that. He
points out that the anti-bullying video is more about Stan helping himself than
helping victims of bullying and repeatedly tells him to be careful he doesn’t
wind up jacking it in San Diego. This sequence is played for laughs, but it shows
just how intuitive Kyle is. He knows about the history of Stan’s big head and
correctly predicts what will happen if it goes too far because he’s seen all
this before. He knows Stan insanely well and is smart enough to see patterns in
his best friend’s behavior that will spell trouble so he warns him because he
cares.

Now, before the next
segment, I want to say that I adore Kyle. He’s a good character, probably the
best person on the show morality wise, but
not
a super great friend. Stan has his issues, but he is a way better friend than
Kyle. I couldn’t analyze Stan and Kyle’s friendship without ranting a bit about
Kyle’s abandonment of Stan in “You’re Getting Old” and “Ass Burgers.” I’m still
furious at Kyle for how quickly he turns his back on Stan during his
depression. Kyle doesn’t even try to help
Stan in his time of need, which is particularly frustrating if you look at how
often Stan goes out of his way for Kyle. He schemes to get Cartman’s kidney to
save Kyle’s life in “Cherokee Hair Tampon,” writes a hit song so Kyle can return
to South Park in “Smug Alert,” and investigates the girls’ list to help Kyle’s
self-esteem in “The List.” I don’t even think those are all the instances where Stan sticks his neck out for Kyle. And
then, after all that, Kyle suddenly decides “I don’t care to be in this
friendship anymore” the minute Stan needs him? That’s pretty shitty, but I
think it makes sense if you look at Kyle’s character.

Kyle certainly has
relationships with the people in his life and cares about their well-being, but
his #1 concern is the right thing. If
he sees someone being wronged, he will intervene, even if that person is
Cartman and even if the wrongdoer is someone he loves. He is able to look at a situation
objectively and figure out the right course of action. This mentality is what
makes Kyle so great, but it’s also what contributes to his self-righteousness. I
think, in Kyle’s mind, he thinks the right thing to do is cut Stan loose. Stan’s
depression is sad, but it’s also a huge bummer to be around and he feels Stan
is harming his friends without meaning to.

Meanwhile, Stan uses his
heart rather than his head in decision-making. Often, he will only get involved
in a cause if it affects him personally. He leads a charge to protect whales
and dolphins because he loves
animals, encourages people to drive Hybrids and save the planet because his best friend moved away, and campaigns
for gay rights because his dog is
gay. This sounds a little more selfish and, I guess it is, but most of us are
guilty of it. However, Stan’s heart pushes him to protect his loved ones (i.e.
Kyle) past the point when others would have given up.

Part of this is because
Stan is extremely group-oriented. He needs a support system and clings to them
no matter the situation. In “Raisins,” when he becomes goth he latches on to a
new group of friends that share his values. In “You’re Getting Old,” Stan
claims that the only thing that isn’t
shitty to him are his friends. Kyle is a little more independent in that he can
probably survive without being part of a clique. However, I think this is where
the difference lies: Stan needs a friend group, but Kyle needs Stan
specifically. Looking back at all the times Stan has saved Kyle’s ass, it makes
me think that no matter how outgoing or badass Kyle is, he really needs Stan. Who else is going to
confront a fraud psychic to convince him not to go to Jewish boarding school? Not
Cartman or Kenny.

So there you have it.
This was long as hell, but I wanted to get all my thoughts on the page.
Basically Kyle is the head and Stan is the heart and neither can operate
without the other. It’s what makes them such an iconic duo and a strong team.
Maybe you can take this and write an analysis on how this compares to Matt and
Trey’s friendship. I hope I answered your question to your satisfaction!

Cool, thanks for the analysis!

The way I see it, it’s true what you said that the characters were still kind of looking for their final form in the early seasons but by now they’re pretty solid. While I think that the characters of the show themselves are quite well defined, believable and logical, sometimes the writers end up having to take some liberties to serve the story, even if it doesn’t seem to be completely justified from the character continuity point of view. I’m never a big fan of when that happens, because to me the best approach is always (which is what I’m sure Trey and Matt also prefer and are more proud of) to start from “How would this character react to this/ What would this character do in this situation?” rather than “What do we need to happen in the story next?”

I think that some of the potholes in the boys relationship are explained more by half baked story writing than well thought out character development, but I think you did a great job in outlining it all! Especially the heart vs the brain thing. I would love to do what you suggested and expand this whole thing to apply to Matt and Trey’s relation/ friendship but unfortunately I don’t really have the brain power for it now (because I would have to dig pretty deep, lol) but I think that in general the heart & the brain thing applies to Trey and Matt perfectly too.

I don’t know how to write this without it turning into a Stan vs Kyle discussion..this part “probably the best person on the show morality wise, but
not a super great friend.” I think you are not being fair with Kyle by mentioning assburgers and leaving out what is, in my opinion, Stan’s worse friendship betrayal, that time he chose popularity over Kyle, literally turning his back to him and leaving Kyle to get beaten, then dismissing it all when Kyle told them they have all abandoned him after the metro thing was over, then there is the last two seasons, in s19 Stan sided with the no more speeches because
just because, as behind the blow said this may be a bad writing arbitrary decision, doesn’t change the fact it’s still in the show therefore it’s part of his character, s20 wasn’t as bad yet we still saw him leaving Kyle alone in his battle to make peace the moment he crossed eyes with Wendy.

That’s a fair rebuttal
and I very well could have given Kyle a bad rap. I admit I let a little bit of
bias trickle into my analysis because I’m still furious over that “Ass Burgers”
nonsense. I thought about analyzing “South Park is Gay” but decided against it
because it didn’t feel like a Stan vs. Kyle fight to me. It was more like
showing which boys succumb to peer pressure and which don’t.

This episode is another
example why I think Kyle is more independent and able to function without a
group. He is fine with going against the grain and telling off his friends at
the end for abandoning him. Speaking of the abandonment, what Stan did wasn’t
right, but again, I don’t think he did it because of any ill will against Kyle.
He is caught in the middle of a new fad and, unlike Kyle, is unable to push
against it with individualism. Stan is much more inclined to go with the group.

“South Park is Gay” is a cool episode to look at in terms of their personalities. Stan needs to cling to a group so he is more likely to have a hive mind mentality while Kyle is much more committed to being an individual. It also shows one of the many examples of Kyle becoming unhinged when he is rejected (also seen in “Chinpokomon” and “The List”), which shows that even though he is intellectually mature, he’s emotionally unstable. I’d say the opposite is true for Stan. He feels things more deeply than Kyle, but once he gets stuck in that downward spiral he is still able to have a clear head. I’d say that when both boys are down, Kyle gets mad and Stan gets sad.

It’s hard to decide what Stan is thinking in the disagreements he has with Kyle in seasons 19 and 20. If I had to guess, I’d say it’s just because he and Kyle have differing values and, again, Stan finds it easier to go with the group than stand alone with Kyle.

The reason I think the “Ass
Burgers” abandonment is more despicable is because the stakes are undoubtedly
higher. Stan is depressed, isolated, and using alcohol to cope and Kyle is
nowhere to be found. To me, this is worse than Stan’s actions in “South Park is
Gay” because Kyle acts more selfishly. It’s very clearly Kyle saying “I’m
choosing me over you
sorry” and I didn’t get that impression from Stan in “South
Park is Gay.” It seemed more like Stan was put in a tough spot and made the
wrong decision.

Sorry for forcing more
unwanted analysis on you! I appreciate your response and it makes sense. I didn’t mean to pick on Kyle, but I see now that I did a little. Stan isn’t a perfect friend, but Kyle abandoning him in “Ass Burgers” leaves a bad taste in my mouth, far more than Stan’s transgressions, which is why I harp on it more.

No need to say sorry you are not forcing me, I enjoy analyzing too, back to the eps, I can’t still say to agree that assburgers is worse “It’s very clearly Kyle saying “I’m choosing me over you
sorry” this is what Stan did too, he was put in a situation where he had to chose between his reputation in the eyes of kids he wasn’t even close with, or his best friend, and he chose the first, then acted as if he did nothing wrong when confronted about it and went as far as to say Kyle was exaggerating. “the stakes are undoubtedly higher” are they? He knew he was leaving Kyle alone with a bunch of bullies with clear intentions of hurting him (and they did) as for his type of mentality, that is no excuse for the love he should feel for Kyle not having win when he got asked to choose.

And this is why these two f*ck me up. They clearly do love each other, shippy or not, they’re super best friends, yet both of them so easily abandon each other. I tend to notice it more on Kyle’s side, I think. It’s just amazing how easily they bail on each other, yet how far, particularly Stan, will go for the other.

I’m still watcing the series, and I sure as hell don’t remember every detail like more devoted fans, but really. What was the farthest Kyle has gone for Stan. All I can remember right now is when Kyle killed Jesus from what I remember?

nygmobbleblog:

littlehollyleaf:

roguepythia:

I love all the little discussion about Ed’s motivations in 4×14 and
whether he truly wanted to stop Oswald from calling him “Riddler”.

So
I thought I’d bring out some contrasting visuals. Rewatching Kristen’s
scene, I realized it has some striking similarities and contrasts to
4×14.

2×06: “Please don’t call me that!”

4×14: “No, please. Please don’t. PLEASE!”

interesting
 yes, Ed did actively try (and succeed, yikes!) to shut Kristen up in a way he didn’t with Ozzie


though the difference is that with Kristen Ed was, from the start, the assaulter and Kristen the victim?

with Ed and Ozzie this is flipped – Ed is the victim now and Ozzie is the one assaulting him, because even though Ozzie does ultimately back down from his physical attack, he’s still confronting Ed verbally in ways that seemingly make Ed afraid (however logical or illogical that fear might be) – oooh and whether Ozzie knows it or not, via his words/actions he is ‘shutting up’ a part of Ed, like Ed shut up Kristen



but Kristen and Ozzie are, with their words, forcing Ed to confront a side, or possible side, of himself he, ostensibly, doesn’t want to confront though – ie. the part of him that could be labelled ‘psychopath’ or ‘Riddler,’ so there is that in common to both
 and while Ed’s reaction to the label ‘psychopath’ is violently negative, his reaction to the label ‘Riddler’ is more, nuanced I guess? Like, he absolutely doesn’t want to accept that he might be a psychopath, but part of him is happy and even longs to accept the mantle of ‘Riddler’ 
because it’s an identity that paints his darker urges in a more positive light? he’s not a psychopath, he’s The Riddler


(since we’re comparing the reunion scene to others, I still think there’s a bunch of compelling contrasts/comparisons to the scene with Izzy’s cosplay too, damn wish I could make gifs :p)

Well, and it’s not just that being Riddler paints his darker urges in a more positive light. He said as much to Fox, that he’s always felt like there was someone inside him who was smarter and stronger and more desirable, someone to be feared. He said as much to Oswald that first time too, that he has become a butterfly and can’t go back to being a caterpillar. He doesn’t just see that side of him as powerful, but beautiful too.

He actively seeks out becoming this person again post-ice all the way up until a nice, pretty woman tells him she likes him better without it. And he cares about her and doesn’t want to lose her friendship (or relationship, if you don’t think Riddler planted that thought too) so boom, he splits off again. Riddler only appears when Ed needs to shove part of himself down, the part of him that is so powerful and that he wants to be so badly that it literally can’t be contained and explodes out of him like a bomb in a fist.

So yes, I definitely think Ed had both the means and the motivation to shut Oswald up the way he shut Kristen up. It’s not like he hasn’t tried to kill him 925483 different ways already, and it isn’t like Ed didn’t have the physical upper hand, and it’s not even like he froze completely. He sprang into action the second Oswald started threatening to say the name, and Oswald didn’t have a grip on him, Ed is the one who grabbed Oswald as opposed to leaving or reacting the way he did with Kristen. Because I think you’re absolutely right. It’s not that he himself doesn’t want to be the Riddler, doesn’t want Oswald to validate that he’s the Riddler. If Lee hadn’t inadvertently turned Ed against being the Riddler, it’s still something Ed would have been actively seeking out.

witchunters:

we-dance-like-marionettes:

thatdiscovampirething:

A thought.

Riddler has always been the one insisting that Ed is in love with Lee.

Riddler also REALLY wants to be back in control.

Now, I know we’ve had all these things about future romance with Ed/Riddler and Lee, but like


What if this was all a ploy by Riddler to get back on top? Including the Lee thing? Like

  1. Convince Ed he’s in love with Lee – he’s kinda dumb about the difference between love, infatuation and friendship anyway so, easy enough.
  2. Having convinced Ed he’s in love with Lee, threaten to kill her.
  3. Use the fact that Ed will now want to protect the woman he “loves” to make him do whatever Riddler wants, ultimately paving the way for Riddler to come out on top.
  4. (Addendum to 3 really) Oh look who’s in Arkham and could really use Riddler as a friend right now; think we’ve found our method, lads.

The fact that it’s kinda hazy whether Ed/Riddler knew Oswald was in Arkham back when the Lee thing first came up just shows that he’s maybe learned from Oswald a bit – have half a plan, work out the details of the end of it later.

I agree! I notice how when he says to Oswald he has friends and a purpose and doesn’t even mention about having someone he loves. If he hates Oswald SOOOO much why wouldn’t he rub it in his face he “loves Lee?” I think he always needed to reconcile wanting to make up with Oswald (in love with him) and that Ed/Riddler is conscious v subconscious. Look how sarcastic Riddler says “Lee being the love of your life and all” and Ed says “we’re just friends.” I think he always planned on visiting Oswald during this because I think the entire thing was about needing Oswald but not wanting to admit it. Arkham just happened to be where he was and Riddler let Ed believe he’s there to gloat. I think the way 14 was written when Ed says “no you’re wrong I came here to save Lee” it seems like he thinks he’s doing things for one reason but it’s really another rather. He’s mocking and doing all this bullshit because he needs Os’ attention because Os became apathetic. He just doesn’t wanna see he loves Oswald. I mean the writing is solid for this but IDK what the writers are doing but they are solid for this and it pisses me off this writing is SO SOLID and the only reason it’s not solid for them is because they’re m/m and that is the truth.  THE ENTIRE scene in Arkham with Ed/Riddler/Oswald screams every scene where someone doesn’t want to accept their attraction to the same sex/someone whatever. It’s just a shame this can’t be sure for us.

All of this


If that boy doesn’t repress his romantic feelings for Oswald then what’s the point of all this build up


1) What is this all about. Definitely still in the same idea of what we’re talking above here.

2) Ed reproduced the same pattern with Lee that he had with Oswald when he was supporting him during his mayoral campaign. He’s pushed her and adviced her so she could be at her best once she gave him some value. She became the queen of the Narrows by herself, and he was again in this role of “chief of staff” all over again as a right hand man (really lowkey compared to the things he has done for Oswald before, but that’s gonna be kind of my point here). I don’t know if the writers actually intended about giving this a meaning in the way that I still doubt very strongly that they’d go for Ed and Oz as an actual couple, and that it’s just them and their undying love for making parallels over and over again cause it’s good for the aesthetic and for the possible Ed/Lee arc, but it would also 100% fit the theory of him repressing romantic feelings for Oswald and transferring those onto someone else like @we-dance-like-marionettes​ said.

Also remember how Ed tricked Butch in 3A? Ed said to him: “I was not cut out to be number two” leading Butch to think he could actually betray Oswald just to let him think he would want to have the crown and run Gotham, but all of this was just Ed wanting to expose Butch in the end so he would remain the only one at Oswald’s side and have him all for him, doing his best to protect him. Well Ed proved all along that he didn’t mind being “number two” at all during that time, simply because Ed and Oswald don’t share the same interests/goals, and have a personality and a complexity on their own. Like Ed said before to Barbara, he doesn’t have any interest into running Gotham. Ed just wants to have his own little “fun” with his schemes composed of puzzles and riddles that people never wanted to answer to before, dismissing him and just thinking he’s a weirdo. He just wants to experience those on the people who have either wronged him in the past and/or that he considered to be intellectually inferior to him just to prove that he’s better and smarter than everyone, to the point of actually leaving huge clues behind him as some sort of a provocation as in “even with this you won’t beat me cause you can’t compete with me, I’m and always be the smarter one!!”, this is basically the whole point of the Riddler as a supervillain. And at the time his life had a meaning cause he was being useful to Oswald, and Oswald was giving his life a meaning, it works in both ways.

They were and still are connected “like souls”: 

“At the end of the day, these two have more in common than anyone else on the show. They will probably find their way back together, and when they get back together it will be all the more gratifying because they were apart for each other.”

One thing relevant to this that we saw this season:

This is what Ed is answering when Lee says to him: “I couldn’t have done it without you” in an attempt of reassuring him cause he’s feeling useless and without any purpose in life. It’s him saying “I don’t exist just to make your life easier, I don’t care and I’m not feeling it”. He does look really upset.

I remember Oswald saying the same thing to him, that he would be lost without him when Ed was feeling shameful at the idea of disappointing him (the context was different, cause Ed just couldn’t stand the idea of doing this to Oswald, and in that scene with Lee he’s being moody cause it’s all about him before she says she considers him as a friend but that she’s also afraid of “the Riddler”). And I think we all remember Ed’s adorable reaction to Oswald’s words:

My point is that he does seem like he doesn’t want to reproduce what he did before emotionally speaking cause what happened with Oswald hurt him too much, so it looks like the same never ending story of him repressing his feelings for Oswald as always, and I guess that it could be easier to transfer those onto another person, pretending everything is fine to the point that he’s breaking. And we all know that one of Ed’s biggest traits is being in denial regarding pretty much everything that concerns his sentiments and history with Oswald. 

Just something to ponder on


What you two have said above would make a lot of sense in this whole Ed vs Riddler vs dark persona or whatever the fuck they want to call this mess/him, and about who is who, and why Ed would want to trick himself into believing he’s in love with Lee so he could actually go back to Oswald and rise again.

amt149:

Regardless of whether you ship Nygmobblepot or not, Ed & Oswald’s relationship has always been marked by Love. 

They met in the woods because of love. Ed killed Kristen because he loved her too much to let her go. Oswald lost his mother because the Galavans used his love for her against him.

They meet again in Arkham. Oswald visits Ed for help sorting his thoughts out about Fish, and he was only confused in the first place because Oswald didn’t realize that Fish loved him like a son. 

Oswald gets Ed out of Arkham to join his campaign as mayor. Ed presents Oswald with a riddle about love and shows Oswald how the public loves him. (Also I know most people don’t look at the OST song titles, but when Oswald presents Ed with their framed certificates (ie before Ed is made Chief of Staff), the OST that is playing is titled “Penguin in Love.” It’s the first time we hear this OST. Just Saying.)

Oswald falls in love with Ed. Ed falls in love with Isabella. The Riddler is named as a result of this love and the feud begins.

Ed gets unfrozen because Myrtle Jenkins loved him as his biggest fan and saves him, leading Oswald to hold a manhunt for him, reaching to the Narrows, where Ed decides the best thing to mock Oswald with is by shouting “I know you love me, You don’t love me?” Ed stays in the Narrows instead of being captured by Oswald for his mockery because Ed’s under Lee’s protection, and The Riddler reveals that Ed’s dedication to Lee’s leadership is because he’s is love with Lee.

Oswald and Ed meet again in Arkham. Oswald is in Arkham because he faked the death of Martin, who he loved like a son. 

The Riddler manipulated Ed into signing himself into Arkham so Oswald could set him free by using Ed’s love for Lee against him. 

 Their entire relationship was created and changed by Love, even when it wasn’t for each other.

And now, Oswald and the Riddler are together again. I can’t wait to see how love marks their relationship now.

witchunters:

littlehollyleaf:

witchunters:

#
I’m just now realizing how monotonous Ed’s life probably was pre-Season 2 #he went to work and he tried to get people to notice him and mostly they didn’t and he went home #his apartment is packed to the brim with weird stuff #ironically it feels like a bird lining its nest #he spends a LOT of time in there #totally alone #he tries to bring Kristen in and that goes horrifically wrong #he tries to bring Oswald in and that goes really well
 but then Oswald leaves #and after getting used to going to work and being on the phone with Penguin all day and hiding his secrets from his colleagues #and coming home to somebody messing around on his piano and complaining he bought the wrong kind of peanut butter
#it had to be tough to go back to the daily grind #no wonder he fixated really hard on his ‘epic battle’ against Jim #no wonder he’s so unabashedly THRILLED here when Oswald comes BACK #it’s a happy surprise – he’s not used to those #he seeks people out but they don’t come to HIM #(
.if you love something let it go right??) #(also the fact that Oswald comes to Ed with advice instead of for help hurts me) #(Ed brought him here in the first place as a favor – he’s trying to repay it) #(trying to be a good friend) (via @sure-as-eggs)

#this scene had that supposedly *humorous* tone cause of the contrast between them at the moment #but this was truly so gd heartbreaking in so many ways and the angst just kept flooding after that #Ed already being right in the middle of a paranoid crisis therefore thinking Oswald would instantly give him to the police #if he was sharing his plans regarding Jim with him #Ed looking confused and so uncomfortable when he realizes that Oswald isn’t there anymore even if he’s standing in flesh before him #realizing that the mind of the only other human being he was able to share with and could trust is gone cause of what Arkham has done to him #Ed fearing for himself if Oswald was gonna report him fearing he could end up being brainwashed and what he considers to be a vegetable #losing his intelligence aka the thing he treasures the most in his personality but also losing the new identity he’s starting to build #even thinking until the very end of the thing while he was getting caught and that it was over for him that Oswald did give him to Jim #that it was the only logical explanation on how Jim would have succeeded into beating him #now let’s talk about Oswald who got kicked out Ed’s appartment the only person left he thought he has a connection with and could turn to #maybe even giving him a home once again like Ed had done earlier when he was badly injured #leaving after having been not so politely dismissed and rejected but still broadly smiling at Ed until he shut the door to his face #probably reflecting onto that once he was all alone trying to figure out what he’s done wrong while his mind can’t even go there anymore #except via his guilt #probably thinking he’s just a burden to people who’s embarrassing them more than anything else but that he deserves it in every single way #Oswald walking in the cold and the rain of Gotham reflecting on Gertrud’s grave on how alone he is and how his mother is dead because of him #lbr here I have too many feelings and not enough tags for this (@witchunters)

I was PHYSICAL HURT by this scene and the fact the two of them never met up again for the rest of the season, instead continuing to harbour god knows how many misconceptions about each other and each other’s opinions of them as laid out so BEAUTIFULLY IN THESE TAGS UGH!

Their scene in Arkham next season was a BALM TO MY SOUL like, I can’t even TELL YOU

#the ANGST oh the ANGST #tragedy is my biggest kink #
but these two have a tendency to play it just slightly OFF and it’s INFURIATING! #I do ADORE Ed’s little desperate ‘Penguin won’t tell – he’s my friend’ in the mirror later though #which connects directly to all of this #his joy at finally HAVING A REAL FRIEND#only to lose him to Arkham brainwashing #but then also the guilt that maybe it was HIM that drove Ozzie away when he kicked him out #so really it’s all his fault he doesn’t have a friend in Peguin anymore – just like it’s ALWAYS his fault#because he fails at making and keeping friends #only this one hurts THE MOST because for a few glorious weeks Oswald was A REAL FRIEND#but he fucked it up #like he did with Kristen #so no – of course Penguin ISN’T his friend CAN’T be his friend don’t be stupid! #aaah so delicious (via @littlehollyleaf​)

Yes, the Riddler manifesting himself here (=Ed bringing himself down) to tell Ed that he’s naive to trust Oswald, that he can’t have any sort of emotional bond with anyone, and only have him(self) to count on as to preserve himself is just the continuity of Ed’s paranoia crisis in this moment. The Riddler knew he needed Oswald at the time so Ed could “progress*, but he wasn’t obviously very thrilled by Ed’s emotional attachment to Oswald.

We can also assume that once Oswald got Ed out of Arkham, the Riddler didn’t manifest cause he simply didn’t need to, Ed didn’t need him anymore (or the other way around, depending on how you/the writers think D.I.D works, ugh..). That part of Ed was at peace and was finally trusting Owald and accepted the fact that he was gonna be part of Ed’s life for good and he was okay with that. Which is why where the Riddler was being possessive with Ed before naturally transferred/turned into Ed acting that way with Oswald, and why the things Ed did to protect Oswald and keep him all to himself were extreme when he has wanted to prove that he and only himself could be a valuable asset for Oswald’s well-being, and that only the two of them could share this special and unique connection (no homo though).

After all the shit storm we all know about, the miscommunication and misunderstandings between those continues to this day. Ed would rather die than admitting to Oswald that he had missed him, drugged himself, fantasized about him, and went nuts and out of control without him (the only one knowing about this so far is Lucius when he was forced to play the role of Ed’s shrink when Ed had confessed and admitted that to himself when he was high). And Oswald has his own pokerface as a protection for himself so he wouldn’t let Ed know he still loves him even after Ed shot him, and to prove he’s not a slave of his emotions like he accused him to be.

witchunters:

rhavewellyarnbag:

witchunters:

rhavewellyarnbag:

millicentcordelia:

Gotham, s2e07 and s4e11: It wasn’t always fun.

In which Kristen Kringle is reduced to the status of a bicycle or a beloved sweater.  No dignity, even in death.

P.S. Edward also mutilated her body before ultimately dismembering Kristen, piling her body parts into a trunk, and dumping it in a shallow grave.  And then he killed some poor rando, and threw that guy on top of her.

He also toasted himself while “burying” her.

That’s an excellent point: he reframes her murder as the moment of his ‘rebirth’ or ‘unification’, or whatever the hell he calls it-  Which flies in the face of the argument that he might have killer her accidentally- which he did not.  He’s a scientist and an anatomist, so he knows exactly how much pressure applied to the throat would be fatal.  He wasn’t dissociating when he murdered her, he wasn’t experiencing a delusion or a hallucination- so it wasn’t even “Bad Edward” who physically extinguished her life.  “Bad Edward” only manifested afterwards- as he did when Edward murdered Tom Dougherty and disposed of Tom’s body, possibly experiencing a psychotic break.  In the clumsy pseudo-scientific visual language of Gotham, it’s possible to read “Bad Edward” as nothing more than the externalization of what Edward already knows about himself, that he’s a murderer.
Anyway, any philosophizing about Kristen’s death in the grand scheme of Edward’s narrative arc is asinine, because we saw exactly how it happened.  He told her that he’d killed Tom.  She, not surprisingly, wasn’t thrilled to learn that she’d slept with a murderer, and threatened to tell the police.  What probably sealed Kristen’s fate: her oblique threat of sexual assault (”You’re going to go to jail, and they’re going to do terrible things to you”).  Of all of Edward’s protestations, “I’m not like that” alone seems desperate, genuine.  Maybe one day, the writers will give us some sort of explanation for Edward’s bizarre, painful, destructive relationship to sexuality and gender, but until then- we’re left with the unequivocal image of him strangling a woman half his size to death in her underwear (right after sleeping with her, as though there needed to be a greater connection between sex and death) because she said he was unmanly.

This is my exact issue with his “character development”. 

Keep reading